MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4299827348 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4599377

Portage : Soutenir l'innovation canadienne par le partage d'expertise et la gestion des données de recherche

2015· report· fr· W4299827348 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
CARL-ABRC

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de MontréalDalhousie UniversityCompute CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalArizona Biomedical Research CommissionMcGill University
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours de la dernière année, l’Association des bibliothèques de recherche du Canada (ABRC) a dirigé un projet visant à faire avancer l’état de la gestion des données de recherche au Canada. Résultat? Portage : un réseau canadien axé sur les bibliothèques qui tire profit de l’expertise de plusieurs groupes d’intervenants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.019
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0260.017
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.808
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research→French-language works237,207→