MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299933968 · doi:10.26443/msurj.v4i1.69

HM: A Legacy in Neuroscience

2009· article· en· W4299933968 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric Eckbo

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyNeuroscienceCognitive scienceCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex


 
 
 
 “The problem of neurology is to understand man him- self.” Walking by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) and Hospital, one might give brief regard to these words coined by Wilder Penfield and prominently displayed on the edifice of the building. It is unlikely, however, that most pas- sersby would have an accurate grasp of the groundbreaking work that has been undertaken by scientists at this institute – research that has delved into the inner workings of the human mind. During the 1930s, Penfield developed the surgical treatment of epilepsy by means of temporal lobe resection, and this procedure became a standard among many neurosurgical centres (Greenblatt, Dagi, et al. 1997). The MNI is also where Brenda Milner began her groundbreaking work in the field of neuropsychology, most notably with a patient who until recently was simply known as HM.
 
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207