Excavating the Spaces and Interpreting the Places of Enslaved Africans and Their Descendants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excavating the Spaces and Interpreting the Places of Enslaved Africans and Their DescendantsGarrett FeslerCabin, Quarter, Plantation: Architecture and Landscapes of North American SlaveryGarrett Fesler's essay is in part an explanatory summary of archaeologists' work at sites of slavery. As Fesler notes, it was archaeologists who discovered evidence that enslaved Africans preserved traditional customs and knowledge, a discovery that confirmed assertions of slave agency, but also one that opened a new dialogue about life under slavery. As the title of the essay...AuthorGarrett FeslerPublisherYale University PressCopyright© 2010 by Yale UniversityRelated print edition pages: pp.27-49 https://doi.org/10.37862/aaeportal.00291.3 Stable URL: https://www.aaeportal.com/?id=-22212Copy Chapter subject tags:Slaves--DwellingsExcavations (Archaeology)Domestic spaceAfrican diasporaPlantationsArchitecture--Southern StatesSoil chemistry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it