MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Review of 'The Becoming of Age' by Pamela H. Gravagne

2014· article· en· W4300561349 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Katz

Bibliographic record

VenueAge Culture Humanities An Interdisciplinary Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In The Becoming of Age, Pamela H. Gravagne has produced a lively and timely conversation among theoretical inquiry, popular cinema, and cultural narratives of aging.Her premise is that film has the capacity to alter consciousness about growing older.Of course, Hollywood is particularly harsh on the aging process, filling its stories with dramatizations of decline and disability where older women are tragically betrayed by their aging bodies, while older men fare only slightly better.However, Gravagne ventures beyond these obvious stereotypes to shake up the temporal confines within which our culture subjugates older people.The first theoretical chapter argues that images matter because their power to represent endows them with the violence to exclude, which makes viewing films an exercise in mediating the myths and realities of aging.But how can we tell the myths from the realities?In response, Gravagne threads discussions of image, discourse, narrative, and myth with theories of essentialism and social construction to create a journey into the cultural spaces of meaning-making itself.The five subsequent chapters tackle gender, intimacy, desire, dementia, time, and being.Each applies the ideas of contemporary theorists such as Judith Butler, Stuart Hall, Pierre Bourdieu, Mikhail Bakhtin, Elizabeth Grosz, Ian Hacking, and Karen Barad, amongst others, to the task of deconstructing cinematic experience and parsing it into finer liberating shades of ambiguity and unpredictability.However, the theoretical reviews can become weighty and break up the continuity of the argument.Theorists from one chapter do not always reappear in later chapters, while the textual shifts between the films and abstract theories create detours that cloud some of the thematic strengths of the chapters.Where Gravagne shines as a theorist is where she pursues her own formulations of postmodern criticism and argues less by way of reference to others, making clear that the originality of her book lies in relocating age at the center of critical thought.Gravagne interprets her selected films (including animated features) in chapters Two and Three according to their potential as "counter-stories."She chooses Clint Eastwood's Gran Torino (2009) because it is about an older man and widower who reinvents himself, learning and growing anew against the decline narrative's firewall.Yet Eastwood's Walt does not fully produce a counter-story because he decides to die (courageously) rather than face his future frailties.This is a generous treatment of the film and of Eastwood, a producer who otherwise champions individualistic vigilantism against the supposed corruption of American traditions, often with the unapologetic use of gun violence.Likewise, Gravagne's discussion of the film Calendar Girls (2003) scores good points about anti-aging culture and the social disadvantages for aging women, but the film's "fairy-tale" ending also puts a cramp in its counter-story adventurousness.The films that illustrate Chapter Four, on "Intimacy and Distance," such as Something's Gotta Give (2003) and Still Doing It: The Intimate Lives of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge Culture Humanities An Interdisciplinary Journal→Same topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US→French-language works237,207→