Life+ Alosa alosa Irstea Interim report 1: actions C1- D7 Years 2011-2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report presents works managed by Irstea, Aquarium La Rochelle and Borea Team concerning the set up of an ex situ rearing method for juveniles Allis shads Alosa alosa, and the monitoring of the sexual maturation. Due to incidental loss of the 2008 batch, first samplings carried out in June 2012 were focused on juveniles from the 2011 batch. Considering their age (one year old) the objective of this first sampling was to start histological monitoring of gonads. / Ce rapport présente les travaux menés par Irstea, l'Aquarium La Rochelle, et l'équipe Borea dans le cadre de la mise au point d'une méthode d'élevage ex situ de juvéniles de grande alose Alosa alosa, et de suivre l'évolution de la maturation sexuelle dans ces conditions. Du fait de la perte accidentelle du lot 2008, les premiers suivis réalisés en juin 2012 ont été réalisés sur les juvéniles du lot 2011. Considérant leur âge (1 an) l'objectif de cette première intervention avait pour but de commencer le suivi histologique des gonades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".