MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300614443 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.02244

Local dimensions of measures of finite type II - Measures without full\n support and with non-regular probabilities

2016· preprint· en· W4300614443 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kathryn E. Hare, Kevin G. Hare, Michael Ka Shing Ng

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsHausdorff dimensionMeasure (data warehouse)Hausdorff measureDimension (graph theory)Type (biology)Discrete mathematicsEffective dimensionCombinatoricsClass (philosophy)InverseInterval (graph theory)Sequence (biology)Bernoulli's principleFinite setProbability measureOuter measureFractalFractal dimensionMinkowski–Bouligand dimensionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a sequence of linear contractions $S_{j}(x)=\\varrho x+d_{j}$ and\nprobabilities $p_{j}>0$ with $\\sum p_{j}=1$. We are interested in the\nself-similar measure $\\mu =\\sum p_{j}\\mu \\circ S_{j}^{-1}$, of finite type. In\nthis paper we study the multi-fractal analysis of such measures, extending the\ntheory to measures arising from non-regular probabilities and whose support is\nnot necessarily an interval.\n Under some mild technical assumptions, we prove that there exists a subset of\nsupp$\\mu $ of full $\\mu $ and Hausdorff measure, called the truly essential\nclass, for which the set of (upper or lower) local dimensions is a closed\ninterval. Within the truly essential class we show that there exists a point\nwith local dimension exactly equal to the dimension of the support. We give an\nexample where the set of local dimensions is a two element set, with all the\nelements of the truly essential class giving the same local dimension. We give\ngeneral criteria for these measures to be absolutely continuous with respect to\nthe associated Hausdorff measure of their support and we show that the\ndimension of the support can be computed using only information about the\nessential class.\n To conclude, we present a detailed study of three examples. First, we show\nthat the set of local dimensions of the biased Bernoulli convolution with\ncontraction ratio the inverse of a simple Pisot number always admits an\nisolated point. We give a precise description of the essential class of a\ngeneralized Cantor set of finite type. Lastly, we study a maximal loop class\nthat is not truly essential.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207