Extending Schumacher’s concept of total accounting and accountability into the 21st century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A journey of socialising the risks associated with global warming : a Gandhian insight into Schumacher's total accounting and accountability / Kala Saravanamuthu -- Developments in the Schumacher ethos / Ian Roderick -- Sustainable atmospheric management / Barrie Pittock, G. Dale Hess -- Decentralised mega visioning : compiling a global scale, beautifully small vision for water / Roderic Gill -- Buddhist economics : a path from an amoral accounting toward a moral one / Jesse Dillard -- Reasons, means and consequences : monitoring soil condition for the proper use of land / Lisa Lobry de Bruyn -- The dilemma in monitoring voluntary labour standards : labour's muted consent to exploit itself / Alex Kaufman, Kala Saravanamuthu -- Developing Schumacher's total accounting into an accountability interface between the science of climate change and the sustainability discourse / Kala Saravanamuthu -- Social accounting for sufficiency : Buddhist principles and practices, and their application in Thailand / Gordon Boyce, Wanna Prayukvong, Apichai Puntasen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".