MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300647979 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1305.4095

Wide Band Time-Correlated Model for Wireless Communications under\n Impulsive Noise within Power Substation

2013· preprint· W4300647979 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fabien Sacuto, Fabrice Labeau, Basile L. Agba

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHydro-QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMarkov chainNoise (video)WirelessComputer scienceImpulse noiseElectronic engineeringMarkov processNoise measurementMarkov modelTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsNoise reductionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The installation of wireless technologies in power substations requires\ncharacterizing the impulsive noise produced by the high-voltage equipment.\nSubstation impulsive noise might interfere with classic wireless communications\nand none of the existing models can reliably represent this noise in wide band.\nPrevious studies have shown that impulsive noise is characterized by series of\ndamped oscillations with the amplitude, the duration and the occurrence times\nof the impulses that are random. All these characteristics make this noise\ntime-correlated and the partitioned Markov chain remains an efficient model\nthat can ensure the correlation between the samples. In this study, we propose\nto design a partitioned Markov chain to generate an impulsive noise that is\nsimilar to the noise measured in existing substations, in time and frequency\ndomains. We configure our Markov chain to produce the impulses with the damped\noscillation effect, then, we determine the probability transition matrix and\nthe distribution of each state of the Markov chain. Finally, we generate noise\nsamples and we study the distribution of the impulsive noise characteristics.\nOur Markov chain model can replicate the correlation between the measured noise\nsamples; also the distributions of the noise characteristics are similar in the\nsimulations and the measurements.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207