MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4300667494 · doi:10.3138/ecf.26.3.455

Book Reviews/Critiques de livres

2014· article· en· W4300667494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentArt historyPoliticsContext (archaeology)ArtHumanitiesHistoryPhilosophyTheologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Janine Barchas, Matters of Fact in Jane Austen: History, Location, and Celebrity, reviewed by Jodi L. Wyett Linda Bree, Peter Sabor, and Janet Todd, eds. Jane Austen’s Manuscript Works, reviewed by Jodi L. Wyett Claudia L. Johnson, Jane Austen”s Cults and Cultures, reviewed by Jodi L. Wyett Shinobu Minma, Jane Austen In and Out of Context, reviewed by Jodi L. Wyett Jane Austen, ed. Bharat Tandon, Emma: An Annotated Edition, reviewed by Jodi L. Wyett Claire Grogan, Politics and Genre in the Works of Elizabeth Hamilton, 1756–1816, reviewed by Sylvana Tomaselli David Francis Taylor, Theatres of Opposition: Empire, Revolution, and Richard Brinsley Sheridan, reviewed by Sylvana Tomaselli Hina Nazar, Enlightened Sentiments: Judgment and Autonomy in the Age of Sensibility, review by James Horowitz John Bender, Ends of Enlightenment, review by Raymond Stephanson Mary McAlpin, Female Sexuality and Cultural Degradation in Enlightenment France: Medicine and Literature, review by Raymond Stephanson Jenny Davidson, Breeding: A Partial History of the Eighteenth Century, review by Raymond Stephanson Gregory Lynall, Swift and Science: The Satire, Politics and Theology of Natural Knowledge, 1690–1730, review by Raymond Stephanson Marie-Hélène Huet, The Culture of Disaster, review by Marshall Brown Zeina Hakim, Fictions déjouées: Le Récit en trompe l’œil au xviii e siècle, review by Françoise Gevrey Éliane Viennot et Nicole Pellegrin eds., Revisiter la “querelle des femmes”: Discours sur l’égalité/inégalité des sexes, de 1750 aux lendemains de la Révolution, review by Karen Offen Shaun Regan, ed., Reading 1759: Literary Culture in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Britain and France, review by Leah Orr Morgan Rooney, The French Revolution Debate and the British Novel, 1790–1814, review by Richard Cronin Robert James Merrett, Daniel Defoe, Contrarian, review by Ashley Marshall Georgios N. Soutsos, intro. and trans. Anna Stavrakopoulou, Alexandrovodas the Unscrupulous (1785), review by Yota Batsaki Marilyn Francus, Monstrous Motherhood: Eighteenth-Century Culture and the Ideology of Domesticity, review by Natalie Roxburgh Bonnie Latimer, Making Gender, Culture, and the Self in the Fiction of Samuel Richardson, review by Anna Deters

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207