LENTIL (Lens esculenta L.) DAMPING-OFF AND ROOT-ROT DISEASES AND THEIR CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN EL-MINIA GOVERNORATE.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eleven isolates of Rhizoctonia solani and 15 isolates of Fusarium sp < /em>p were isolated from lentil rotted roots and crowns. All isolates of R.. solani except two (R2 and Rg) aggressively attacked lentil mostly during their seedling stages. On the other hand. three isolates of F. solani (Fll . F'2 . F,5 ). out of the 15 tested isolates showed high pathological effect at all stages of the subjected plants causing pre- and post- emergence damping-off and root rot. Isolates Rs and Re of R. solani and isolate F" of F. solani attacked six local cultivars of the lentil plants but the three Canadian cultivars tested showed great resistance. Seven fungicides showed various inhibitory effect against R. solani and F. solani in vitro, the four more effective ones (Topsln-M, Rhizolex -T. Monceren and Homi) were tested in vivo. • Two antagonistic bacteria (Bacillus spp < /em>.) with great inhibitory effect towards R. solani and F. solani were secured from lentil rhizosphere and adequately used as a biocontrol agents against the two pathogens in pots experments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".