PROFIL PERALATAN DAN KETERLAKSANAAN PRAKTIKUM FISIKA SMA DI WILAYAH MISKIN PROPINSI BENGKULU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan memperoleh gambaran peralatan dan keterlaksanaan praktikum fisika, dan hambatan-hambatan yang dialami guru dalam menyelenggarakan praktikum fisika di sekolah-sekolah SMA di wilayah miskin Provinsi Bengkulu. Subyek penelitian adalah guru fisika dan laboratorium fisika di 20 sekolah SMA Negeri yang tersebar dalam 10 Kabupaten/Kota di wilayah miskin Propinsi Bengkulu yang dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif dan observasi dengan instrumen berupa angket dan lembar observasi. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh bahwa :1) Peralatan praktikum fisika yang terdapat di sekolah SMA di wilayah miskin Propinsi Bengkulu adalah berupa KIT, alat ukur dasar, dan alat peraga fisika dengan ketersediaan yang minim dan kondisi kurang baik; 2) Jumlah keterlaksanaan praktikum fisika SMA di wilayah miskin Propinsi Bengkulu berada pada kategori kurang baik. 3) Hambatan-hambatan utama yang dialami guru dalam menyelenggarakan praktikum adalah berupa ketersediaan peralatan laboratorium yang terbatas, peralatan yang ada sudah banyak yang rusak, jam mengajar guru yang padat, dan praktikum membutuhkan waktu lama
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".