The effect of resistance training on functional capacity in middle-aged to elderly individuals with peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an ischemic disease of the lower limbs, caused by atherosclerotic plaques, leading to impairments in functional capacity and reduced quality of life. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of 12-week and 24-week resistance training (RT) interventions on 6-minute walking distance (6WMD) and initial claudication distance (ICD) measured during a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with an electronic search conducted using the online database of PUBMED. Methodological quality of all included studies was completed using a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). The effect sizes (ES) of 6MWD and ICD were calculated, with the 12-week and 24-week interventions analyzed separately. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: An initial literature search yielded 1973 results that were consequently reduced to 7 studies to be included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect size for 6MWD for 12-week and 24-week interventions was ES=0.189 [95% CI: -0.074 to 0.451] P=0.159 and ES=0.298 [95% CI: -0.036 to 0.631] P=0.080 respectively. For ICD, ES=0.498 [95% CI: 0.000 to 0.995] P=0.050 and ES: 1.106 [95% CI: 0.120 to 0.428] P=0.001 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term RT interventions have a positive effect on functional capacity in middle-aged to elderly individuals with PAD. There was a greater effect on ICD compared to 6MWD, with 24-week interventions showing larger effects for both measures. Improvements in functional capacity in such populations confers significant potential for positive health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".