Theory and Design of Counter Flow Shell-and-Coil Heat Exchanger for CO2Based Solar Water Heater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A shell type helical tube countercurrent flow heat exchanger was designed, fabricated and tested using CO2 refrigerant material. Helical copper tube was immersed in bulk water tank. Hot CO2 was piped to upper coil baffle and cold CO2 was circulated into collector loop through lower baffle. Cold water was made to enter through lower tap and hot water was taken out from upper tap. Both in/out pipes were inserted from the top and coil tubes from upper and lower sides of water tank. Supercritical thermosyphon operation was achieved by evacuated glass tube solar heat collector using CO2 refrigerant. U shaped copper pipes enveloped in aluminum foil were inserted in evacuated glass tubes to transfer heat under thermosiphon principle to upper header connected to inlet baffle of shell type helical coil heat exchanger. Lower header was connected to heat exchanger helical coil outlet baffle. Solar collector heat raised CO2 refrigerant temperature from 35 to 78C giving temperature difference of 43C. Temperature of CO2 refrigerant at exit from heat exchanger was found to be 40C at surrounding ambient temperature of 36C. Heat exchanger raised the inlet water temperature from 26 to 55C under off water tap condition in about 3 hours. Inlet and outlet temperature difference of heat exchanger was measured to be 27C. We believe system efficiency can further increase if we use the system in mild sunshine cold weather regions duplicating geothermal loop.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".