MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301103492 · doi:10.36303/jsava.515

Lung lobe torsion in association with a pulmonary papillary carcinoma in a dog

2022· article· en· W4301103492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E Ciriano, M Marrington, J Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the South African Veterinary Association · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHistopathologyLungPleural effusionThoracotomyPathologyRadiologyCarcinomaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lung lobe torsion (LLT) is an uncommon condition in dogs reported to be most commonly idiopathic or secondary to trauma, pleural effusion, lung lobectomy or thoracic neoplasia. Carcinomas are the most common primary lung tumours in dogs, but only a few cases have been reported in association with LLT in veterinary medicine. This case describes an adult male neutered Labrador, which presented with lethargy, weight loss and pleural effusion. Computed tomography (CT), cytology of the lung, thoracocentesis and fluid analysis were performed. CT revealed pleural effusion and torsion of the left cranial lung lobe with no evidence of a pulmonary mass or metastatic disease. Thoracotomy and left cranial lung lobectomy were performed. Intraoperatively there was no macroscopic evidence of pulmonary neoplasia. Histopathology of the lobar tissue confirmed grade 2 pulmonary papillary carcinoma. It is possible that early detection and surgical management might help to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with LLT. However, as in this case, the underlying cause for the LLT will ultimately determine the patient's prognosis. The final diagnosis of papillary carcinoma in this case, was only made via histopathological assessment of the pulmonary tissue as it was unclear on the advanced imaging and macroscopic intraoperative evaluation of the lungs. This case highlights the importance of considering pulmonary neoplasia as a differential for LLT even in the absence of a macroscopic mass, and therefore the value of performing histopathology on the excised lung tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the South African Veterinary AssociationSame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207