MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301134121 · doi:10.54799/egig5418

Caribou Hunting in Alpine West Greenland. An Archaeological Investigation

2015· article· en· W4301134121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Volker Neubeck, Clemens Pasda

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPeriod (music)ArchaeologyRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2014––2015 surveys have been made in the mountain range north of Kangerluarsunnguup Tasersua, a large inland lake south of Nuuk (West Greenland). As evidence of Paleo-Inuit and Norse is scarce, no detailed information can be given on caribou hunting during these time periods. In contrast, 88 sites connected with caribou hunting in Late Thule (c. AD 1600–-1700) and the Colonial time period (c. AD 1700–-1950) have been registered. These sites indicate three distinct alpine hunting grounds. Every hunting ground was used by small, mobile groups of hunting companions, only one also by small, related households who stayed at one spot for a longer time period. Households and hunters preferred to sleep at medium height to hunt caribou here as well as in the highest areas. Caribou hunting with the help of drive lanes was done rarely. In contrast, the main hunting method was using single or few stone-built shooting coverts which are situated in small, natural bottlenecks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische ZeitschriftSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207