<i>Irx1</i> and <i>Irx2</i> play dose-dependent cooperative functions in mammalian development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Irx1 and Irx2 ( Irx1/2 ) are two closely linked and widely expressed members of the conserved Iroquois homeobox family of transcription factors. Despite mounting evidence suggesting the importance of homologs of these genes in many aspects of vertebrate development and function, the role of Irx1/2 in mammals has remained largely unknown. Here, we used mice carrying our newly generated Irx1 flox and Irx1 flox Irx2 del mutant alleles to perform a stepwise genetic ablation of Irx1 and Irx2 levels. Our analysis revealed reduced postnatal growth and viability of Irx1 KO mice with gross histological defects in the lung and gut and demonstrated that ablation of one copy of Irx2 in these mice results in neonatal lethality with exacerbated phenotypic defects. Conversely, while Irx2 KO mice appear normal, ablation of one copy of Irx1 in these mutants leads to lethality at weaning. Furthermore, we found that homozygous deletion of both Irx1 and Irx2 results in embryonic lethality by mid-gestation with defective extraembryonic vasculature. Our results illustrate that Irx1 and Irx2 play distinct dose-dependent cooperative functions during both the early and late stages of mouse development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".