MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301401385 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.988666

D-dimer levels and characteristics of lymphocyte subsets, cytokine profiles in peripheral blood of patients with severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4301401385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haiyue Zhang, Hua‐Jun Wu, Dongli Pan, Weifeng Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisInternal medicineLymphocyteCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GastroenterologyWeb of sciencePooled varianceDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose A series of complications caused by severe COVID-19 can significantly affect short-term results. Therefore, early diagnosis is essential for critically COVID-19 patients. we aimed to investigate the correlation among D-dimer levels, lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Methods Systematic review and meta- analysis of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, clinical trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) until 1 August 2022. We considered case-control, and cohort studies that compared laboratory parameters between patients with severe or non-serious diseases or between survivors and non-survivors. Pooled data was assessed by use of a random-effects model and used I 2 to test heterogeneity. We assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle- Ottawa Scale. Results Of the 5,561 identified studies, 32 were eligible and included in our analysis ( N = 3,337 participants). Random-effect results indicated that patients with COVID-19 in severe group had higher levels for D-dimer (WMD = 1.217 mg/L, 95%CI=[0.788, 1.646], P < 0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (WMD = 6.939, 95%CI = [4.581, 9.297], P < 0.001), IL-2 (WMD = 0.371 pg/ml, 95%CI = [−0.190, 0.932], P = 0.004), IL-4 (WMD = 0.139 pg/ml, 95%CI = [0.060, 0.219], P = 0.717), IL-6 (WMD = 44.251 pg/ml, 95%CI = [27.010, 61.493], P < 0.001), IL-10 (WMD = 3.718 pg/ml, 95%CI = [2.648, 4.788], P < 0.001) as well as lower levels of lymphocytes (WMD = −0.468( × 10 9 /L), 95%CI = [−0.543, −0.394], P < 0.001), T cells (WMD = −446.746(/μL), 95%CI = [−619.607, −273.885], P < 0.001), B cells (WMD = −60.616(/μL), 95%CI = [−96.452, −24.780], P < 0.001), NK cells (WMD = −68.297(/μL), 95%CI = [−90.600, −45.994], P < 0.001), CD3+T cells (WMD = −487.870(/μL), 95%CI = [−627.248, −348.492], P < 0.001), CD4+T cells (WMD = −290.134(/μL), 95%CI = [−370.834, −209.435], P < 0.001), CD8+T cells (WMD = −188.781(/μL), 95%CI = [−227.806, −149.757], P < 0.001). Conclusions There is a correlation among higher levels of D-dimer, cytokines, lower levels of lymphocyte subsets, and disease severity in COVID-19 patients. These effective biomarkers may help clinicians to evaluate the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020196659. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=196659 ; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020196659.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207