Huntingtin is essential for synaptic plasticity in the adult hippocampus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Huntingtin (HTT), an exceptionally large protein with hundreds of interacting partners within the central nervous system, has been extensively studied due to its role in Huntington’s disease (HD) pathology. HD is a monogenic disorder caused by a polyglutamine repeat expansion in the HTT gene, which results in the production of a pathogenic mutant huntingtin (mHTT) protein, and toxic effects of this mutant protein in the context of HD have been well-established. Less-established, however, is the role of wild type HTT (wtHTT) in the adult brain, particularly in areas outside the corticostriatal pathway. wtHTT has previously been suggested to play a vital role in cellular functions that promote synapse homeostasis, such as fast axonal transport of synaptic cargo, vesicle replenishment and receptor localization and stability. Synaptic dysfunction precedes and predicts cell death in many neurodegenerative diseases including HD (termed synaptopathies) and whether proper synaptic transmission can be maintained without wtHTT in extrastriatal brain areas such as the hippocampus remains unknown. Consequences of wtHTT reduction in the adult brain are of particular importance as clinical trials for many non-selective HTT-lowering therapies for HD are underway, which are unable to distinguish between mHTT and wtHTT, and therefore reduce levels of both proteins. We investigated the consequences of wtHTT loss of function in the CA3-CA1 pathway of the adult hippocampus using a conditional knockout mouse model and found that 1-2 month deletion of wtHTT in excitatory hippocampal neurons inhibits post-tetanic potentiation and completely abolishes NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation in these animals. These data reveal a novel role of wtHTT as an essential regulator of short- and long-term plasticity in the adult hippocampus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".