WWP2 confers risk to osteoarthritis by affecting cartilage matrix deposition via hypoxia associated genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the co-expression network of the osteoarthritis (OA) risk gene WWP2 in articular cartilage and study cartilage characteristics when mimicking the effect of OA risk allele rs1052429-A on WWP2 expression in a human 3D in vitro model of cartilage. METHOD: Co-expression behavior of WWP2 with genes expressed in lesioned OA articular cartilage (N = 35 samples) was explored. By applying lentiviral particle mediated WWP2 upregulation in 3D in vitro pellet cultures of human primary chondrocytes (N = 8 donors) the effects of upregulation on cartilage matrix deposition was evaluated. Finally, we transfected primary chondrocytes with miR-140 mimics to evaluate whether miR-140 and WWP2 are involved in similar pathways. RESULTS: Upon performing Spearman correlations in lesioned OA cartilage, 98 highly correlating genes (|ρ| > 0.7) were identified. Among these genes, we identified GJA1, GDF10, STC2, WDR1, and WNK4. Subsequent upregulation of WWP2 on 3D chondrocyte pellet cultures resulted in a decreased expression of COL2A1 and ACAN and an increase in EPAS1 expression. Additionally, we observed a decreased expression of GDF10, STC2, and GJA1. Proteomics analysis identified 42 proteins being differentially expressed with WWP2 upregulation, which were enriched for ubiquitin conjugating enzyme activity. Finally, upregulation of miR-140 in 2D chondrocytes resulted in significant upregulation of WWP2 and WDR1. CONCLUSIONS: Mimicking the effect of OA risk allele rs1052429-A on WWP2 expression initiates detrimental processes in the cartilage shown by a response in hypoxia associated genes EPAS1, GDF10, and GJA1 and a decrease in anabolic markers, COL2A1 and ACAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".