Tuned bipolar oscillating gradients for mapping frequency dispersion of diffusion kurtosis in the human brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequences have demonstrated an ability to probe time‐dependent microstructural features, although they often suffer from low SNR due to increased TEs. In this work we introduce frequency‐tuned bipolar (FTB) gradients as a variation of oscillating gradients with reduced TE and demonstrate their utility by mapping the frequency dispersion of kurtosis in human subjects. Methods An FTB oscillating gradient waveform is presented that provides encoding of 1.5 net oscillation periods, thereby reducing the TE of the acquisition. Simulations were performed to determine an optimal protocol based on the SNR of kurtosis frequency dispersion—defined as the difference in kurtosis between pulsed and oscillating gradient acquisitions. Healthy human subjects were scanned at 7T using pulsed gradient and an optimized 23 Hz FTB protocol, which featured a maximum b‐value of 2500 s/mm2. In addition, to directly compare existing methods, measurements using traditional cosine OGSE were also acquired. Results FTB oscillating gradients demonstrated equivalent frequency‐dependent diffusion measurements compared with cosine‐modulated OGSE while enabling a significant reduction in TE. Optimization and in vivo results suggest that FTB gradients provide increased SNR of kurtosis dispersion maps compared with traditional cosine OGSE. The optimized FTB gradient protocol demonstrated consistent reductions in apparent kurtosis values and increased diffusivity in generated frequency dispersion maps. Conclusions This work presents an alternative to traditional cosine OGSE sequences, enabling more time‐efficient acquisitions of frequency‐dependent diffusion quantities as demonstrated through in vivo kurtosis frequency dispersion maps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".