Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2010), "Research in Consumer Behavior", Belk, R.W. (Ed.) Research in Consumer Behavior (Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 12), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. iii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-2111(2010)0000012018 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Research in Consumer Behavior Research in Consumer Behavior Copyright page List of Contributors Introduction Consumer attitudes toward organic foods: An exploration of U.S. market segments Shopping matters: Taiwanese young tourists’ consumer culture in England Cue congruency and product involvement effects on generation y attitudes Country-of-manufacture labeling effect on product quality evaluations: A model incorporating consumers’ attention Socialization of adult and young consumers into materialism: The roles of media and church in Peru Motivation for luxury consumption: Evidence from a metropolitan city in China Consuming cool: Behind the unemotional mask The strategic use of brand biographies Authentic Brand Narratives: Co-Constructed Mediterraneaness for l’Occitane Brand Consuming authentic neighborhood: An autoethnography of experiencing a neighborhood's new beginnings and origins within its servicescapes Better understanding construction of the self in daily contingencies: an investigation of the materiality of consumption experiences in online discussion forums “Pixelize me!”: Digital storytelling and the creation of archetypal myths through explicit and implicit self-brand association in fashion and luxury blogs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".