MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4302287403 · doi:10.1002/dta.3378

Detection of activin receptor type IIA and IIB‐Fc fusion proteins by automated capillary immunoassay

2022· article· en· W4302287403 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Desharnais, Jean‐François Naud

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Testing and Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersPartnership for Clean Competition
KeywordsImmunoassayFusion proteinReceptorActivin receptorErythropoiesisAntibodyIneffective erythropoiesisChemistryImmunologyMedicineInternal medicineRecombinant DNAAnemiaBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activin receptor type IIA and type IIB fusion protein have been designed to sequester circulating molecules of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily and inactivate their actions. Members of this superfamily have been reported as essential regulators of erythropoiesis by triggering the formation of activated ternary complexes containing different combinations of type I and type II receptors, which can limit RBC production by accelerating erythroid differentiation and inhibiting erythroid progenitor expansion. The recent approval of Luspatercept for the treatment of anemia associated to transfusion-dependent MDS and Beta-thalassemia in afflicted patients means that it can now pose a real threat of being abused in sport for its ability to stimulate erythropoiesis. Several methods for the detection of these molecules in blood have been proposed for the purpose of sport antidoping control. Here we propose the detection of the ActRIIA-Fc and ActRIIB-Fc fusion proteins by automated capillary Western immunoassay (Simple Western). The use of these immunoassays for the detection of protein targets has become widespread in the recent years. The work presented here demonstrates that this methodology enables a versatile, rapid, and sensitive detection of activin ligand traps in blood samples: plasma, serum, or dried blood spots (DBS). Preliminary results indicate that detection in urine samples is also possible. The option to use different antibodies allows the possibility to use this method as an initial testing procedure as well as a confirmation procedure. Finally, results coming from an administration study confirm that the method is suitable for routine analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Testing and AnalysisSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207