Finitely $\\mathcal{F}$-amenable actions and Decomposition Complexity of\n Groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his work on the Farrell-Jones Conjecture, Arthur Bartels introduced the\nconcept of a "finitely $\\mathcal{F}$-amenable" group action, where\n$\\mathcal{F}$ is a family of subgroups. We show how a finitely\n$\\mathcal{F}$-amenable action of a countable group $G$ on a compact metric\nspace, where the asymptotic dimensions of the elements of $\\mathcal{F}$ are\nbounded from above, gives an upper bound for the asymptotic dimension of $G$\nviewed as a metric space with a proper left invariant metric. We generalize\nthis to families $\\mathcal{F}$ whose elements are contained in a collection,\n$\\mathfrak{C}$, of metric families that satisfies some basic permanence\nproperties: If $G$ is a countable group and each element of $\\mathcal{F}$\nbelongs to $\\mathfrak{C}$ and there exists a finitely $\\mathcal{F}$-amenable\naction of $G$ on a compact metrizable space, then $G$ is in $\\mathfrak{C}$.\nExamples of such collections of metric families include: metric families with\nweak finite decomposition complexity, exact metric families, and metric\nfamilies that coarsely embed into Hilbert space.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".