Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue comprises contributions on labour law and industrial relations in very different places in various parts of the world: First of all, Michael A. Yanou reviews the rules for the registration of trade unions in Cameroon in the context of obligations assumed when the country ratifi ed ILO Convention no.87 in 1960.He criticizes both the substantive law and bureaucratic rules and practices for undermining the ILO rules of freedom of association and other obligations assumed under international law.Two country reports from East Asia follow, dealing with highly interesting matters: Jafar Suryomenggolo explores the drafting process of independent Indonesia's fi rst major piece of labour legislation, Undang Undang Kerdja 1948 (Labour Act 1948).The author shows that the Act was a product of the identifi cation, construction, and regulation of labour at a time when the revolutionary Indonesian State was consolidating its power over society.Md. Saiful Karim analyses the violation of labour rights in the shipbreaking yards of Bangladesh and identifi es the major issues relating to enforcement of labour rights in this sector of the Bangladesh economy where regulation is almost totally absent.Less exotic, but equally stimulating, is the paper by Kevin Purse and Robert Guthrie dealing with workers' compensation in Australia.After outlining previous attempts to develop a national workers' compensation framework, they turn to a consideration of more recent policy and legal developments which have contributed to the emerging regulatory realignment of workers' compensation laws and policy and identify the major constraints on the drive for a national regulatory framework.The issue closes with two papers from Europe: Alice Le Flanchec and Jaques Rojot discuss Alternative Dispute Resolution in labour relations at IBM France.In contrast with the United States and Canada, mediation and arbitration are rarely used in France for resolving individual or collective labour disputes.It is therefore interesting to study such voice procedures in labour relations in France and analyse their impact on procedural justice and equity within the company.In Sweden, on the other hand, members of an employer's family are exempted from the Employment Protection Act.In her paper on family ties in Swedish employment law, Catharina Calleman shows that this typically increases the dependence of an employer's spouse, counteracting the aim of mutual autonomy between spouses in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".