Dose–Response Effects of Glutathione Supplement in Parenteral Nutrition on Pulmonary Oxidative Stress and Alveolarization in Newborn Guinea Pig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
metabolism and those contaminating the parenteral nutrition (PN) leading to increased oxidative stress, which is a major contributor to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) development. In animals, the supplementation of PN with glutathione prevented the induction of pulmonary oxidative stress and hypoalveolarization (characteristic of BPD). Hypothesis: the dose of glutathione that corrects the plasma glutathione deficiency is sufficient to prevent oxidative stress and preserve pulmonary integrity. Three-day-old guinea pigs received a PN, supplemented or not with GSSG (up to 1300 µg/kg/d), the stable form of glutathione in PN. Animals with no handling other than being orally fed constituted the control group. After 4 days, lungs were removed to determine the GSH, GSSG, redox potential and the alveolarization index. Total plasma glutathione was quantified. The effective dose to improve pulmonary GSH and prevent the loss of alveoli was 330 µg/kg/d. A 750 µg/kg/d dose corrected the low-plasma glutathione, high-pulmonary GSSG and oxidized redox potential. Therefore, the results suggest that, in a clinical setting, the dose that improves low-plasma glutathione could be effective in preventing BPD development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".