MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P010: Inferior Outcomes for Young Adults Treated on Advanced Stage Clinical Trials: Report from the HoLISTIC Consortium

2022· article· en· W4303983498 on OpenAlexaff
Susan K. Parsons, Angie Mae Rodday, Jonathan W. Friedberg, Andrea Gallamini, Eliza A. Hawkes, David M. Hodgson, Peter Johnson, Brian K. Link, Matthew J. Maurer, Jason Nelson, Kerry J. Savage, Jenica Upshaw, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Andrew M. Evens

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialYoung adultStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineHazard ratioPediatricsConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure 1: Relationship Between Age and Risk of Progression and Death (n=3893). Background: Inferior outcomes have been reported for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) across several cancer types, as compared to younger pediatric or older patients (pts). While lack of access to clinical trials has been implicated, we described inferior outcomes for AYAs treated on a large US Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) adult study (Henderson, 2018). Earlier this year, in an analysis of three US phase 3 pediatric HL trials, worse outcomes were reported for pts >15 years (yrs) compared with younger pts (Kahn, 2022). Little is known about the impact of age on outcomes from recent adult clinical trials. Methods: Individual patient data from eight advanced stage clinical trials (ECOG2496, SWOG0816, HD2000, HD9601, HD0607, HD0801, UK Stanford V, and RATHL), conducted from 1996–2012, were harmonized as part of the HoLISTIC Consortium. Pts with classic HL, stage IIb, III or IV disease, ages 14–65 yrs, and treated at adult centers were included. Outcomes were 5-yr progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-yr overall survival (OS), which were estimated in univariable and multivariable models. Age at diagnosis and 10 other clinical factors, were examined with multivariable adjusted plots and piecewise linear splines to identify functional forms of the relationship with PFS or OS. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Results: Data on 3893 HL patients were included. Across all studies, 5-year PFS was 76.5% (95% CI=75.1%, 77.9%); 5-year OS was 91.6% (95% CI=90.7%, 92.6%). Median age was 32 yrs and 41% of patients were <30 yrs at diagnosis. Associations between age (analyzed as a continuous variable) and PFS displayed a distinct piecewise linear relationship with an inflection point at age 30 (Figure A). In multivariable analyses, PFS improved from ages 14 to 30, and then declined after age 30 (Figure B). The association between age and OS was not significant <30 yrs, advancing age >30 yrs was associated with worse OS. These patterns were seen broadly across studies and not dominated by one trial. Conclusion: The association between age and HL survival in the modern era appears to be more nuanced than the dichotomous variable of age at 45 yrs, as used in previous models. While patients under 30 yrs have worse short-term disease outcomes than age 30 yrs, 5-yr OS results suggest that younger patients may be amenable to successful salvage. Further research is needed to understand these differences to optimize outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207