Eocene Terrane Accretion in Northern Cascadia Recorded by Brittle Left‐Lateral Slip on the San Juan Fault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The San Juan fault (SJF), on southern Vancouver Island, Canada, juxtaposes the oceanic Wrangellia and Pacific Rim terranes in the northern Cascadia forearc, and has been suggested to play a role in multiple Mesozoic‐Cenozoic terrane accretion events. However, direct observations of the SJF's kinematics have not been documented and its exact role in accommodating strain arising from terrane accretion is unknown. To test if, how, and when the SJF accommodated accretion‐related strain, we use geologic mapping, kinematic inversion of fault‐plane slickenlines, and dating of marine sediments to constrain the timing and direction of brittle slip of the SJF.P‐ andT‐axes from kinematic inversions indicate predominantly left‐lateral slip. Left‐lateral brittle faulting cross‐cuts ∼51 Ma magmatic intrusions and foliation, providing a maximum age of brittle deformation. The fault zone is non‐conformably overlain by a >300 m‐thick sequence of clastic marine shelf and slope sediments that are not left‐laterally offset. A strontium isotope age of foraminifers helps constrain the depositional age of the sediments to late Eocene–early Oligocene, bracketing left‐lateral slip to the Eocene. Eocene left‐lateral slip is temporally and kinematically consistent with regional southwest‐northeast compression during accretion of the Siletzia ocean island plateau, suggesting brittle slip on the SJF accommodated strain resulting from the accretion of this terrane. This result does not support hypotheses that brittle slip along the SJF directly accommodated earlier accretion of the Pacific Rim terrane to Wrangellia, instead it offsets the older accretionary boundary between these two terranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".