MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304084152 · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01475-z

A proteome-scale map of the SARS-CoV-2–human contactome

2022· article· en· W4304084152 on OpenAlexafffund
Dae‐Kyum Kim, Benjamin Weller, Chung‐Wen Lin, Dayag Sheykhkarimli, Jennifer J. Knapp, Guillaume Dugied, Andreas Zanzoni, Carles Pons, Marie J. Tofaute, Sibusiso B. Maseko, Kerstin Spirohn, Florent Laval, L. Lambourne, Nishka Kishore, Ashyad Rayhan, Mayra Sauer, Veronika Young, Hridi Halder, Nora Marín‐de la Rosa, Oxana Pogoutse, Alexandra Strobel, Patrick Schwehn, Roujia Li, Simin Rothballer, Melina Altmann, Patricia Cassonnet, Atina G. Coté, Lena Elorduy Vergara, Isaiah Hazelwood, Betty B. Liu, Maria Nguyen, Ramakrishnan Pandiarajan, Bushra Dohai, Patricia A. Rodriguez, Juline Poirson, Paolo Giuliana, Luc Willems, Mikko Taipale, Yves Jacob, Tong Hao, David E. Hill, Christine Brun, Jean‐Claude Twizere, Daniel Krappmann, Matthias Heinig, Claudia Falter, Patrick Aloy, Caroline Demeret, Marc Vidal, Michael A. Calderwood, Frederick P. Roth, Pascal Falter‐Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMuscular Dystrophy CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersMichigan Technology Tri-CorridorCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de ParisWallonie-Bruxelles InternationalTechnische Universität MünchenCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsUniversity of TorontoHelmholtz Zentrum MünchenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungBelgian American Educational FoundationCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversité de LiègeEuropean CommissionFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSInstitute for Research in BiomedicineAix-Marseille UniversitéCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleRoswell Park Cancer Institute
KeywordsBiologyProteomeVirusComputational biologyHost (biology)Viral replicationSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)VirologyCoronavirusGeneDiseaseGeneticsInfectious disease (medical specialty)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the mechanisms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease severity to efficiently design therapies for emerging virus variants remains an urgent challenge of the ongoing pandemic. Infection and immune reactions are mediated by direct contacts between viral molecules and the host proteome, and the vast majority of these virus-host contacts (the 'contactome') have not been identified. Here, we present a systematic contactome map of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with the human host encompassing more than 200 binary virus-host and intraviral protein-protein interactions. We find that host proteins genetically associated with comorbidities of severe illness and long COVID are enriched in SARS-CoV-2 targeted network communities. Evaluating contactome-derived hypotheses, we demonstrate that viral NSP14 activates nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)-dependent transcription, even in the presence of cytokine signaling. Moreover, for several tested host proteins, genetic knock-down substantially reduces viral replication. Additionally, we show for USP25 that this effect is phenocopied by the small-molecule inhibitor AZ1. Our results connect viral proteins to human genetic architecture for COVID-19 severity and offer potential therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207