MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304136202 · doi:10.1016/j.sleepe.2022.100047

Parental socioeconomic status and childhood sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4304136202 on OpenAlexaff
Emily E. Cameron, Dana Watts, Katherine Silang, Ashley Dhillon, Pooja R. Sohal, Anna MacKinnon, Leslie E. Roos, Lianne Tomfohr‐Madsen

Bibliographic record

VenueSleep Epidemiology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisSocioeconomic statusPsycINFOMedicineModerationCINAHLDemographyMEDLINESleep (system call)PediatricsPsychologyPsychological interventionPsychiatryPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parental socioeconomic status (SES) is increasingly understood to be a key contributor to sleep health, but the research in childhood has not been synthesized. To examine the associations between indicators of child SES and child sleep (≤18 years old), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses. CINAHL with Full Text, PsycINFO, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Embase were searched using terms to define SES and childhood to ascertain all relevant, peer-reviewed articles from database inception to 27 December 2019. Studies were included if an association between an indicator of parental SES and a measure of child sleep (duration, quality, and problems) was reported. Data was extracted from 46 studies (N = 72,915). Across these studies, total sample size across participants included in the meta-estimate was N = 69,373. Data was extracted from 46 studies (N = 72,915). Across these studies, total sample size across participants included in the meta-estimate was N = 69,373. Higher parental education was associated with longer childhood sleep duration (stronger in samples with a higher proportion of White children) (OR = 1.302, 95% CI [1.111, 1.526], p = .001) and better sleep quality (OR = 1.332, 95% CI [1.014, 1.751], p = .040). Parental education was not directly associated with child sleep problems (OR = 1.191, 95% CI [0.733, 1.935], p = .479); moderation occurred by continent and the relationship was more pronounced in the Asian meta-estimate. Higher household income was not directly associated with longer childhood sleep duration (OR = 0.570, 95% CI [0.167, 1.943], p = 0.369), but moderation occurred by higher quality studies and the proportion of White children in the sample. Higher household income was associated with fewer sleep problems (moderated by continent) (OR = 0.764 (95% CI [0.689, 0.848], p < .001) and higher sleep quality (OR = 1.558, 95% CI [1.036, 2.342], p = .033). This review was limited by the number and methods of available published studies meeting inclusion criteria. Preventative programs that emphasize improvements in sleep of children and adolescents growing up in lower SES families are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSleep EpidemiologySame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207