The Hydrolysis Rate of Paraoxonase-1 Q and R Isoenzymes: An In Silico Study Based on In Vitro Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human serum paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is an important hydrolase-type enzyme found in numerous tissues. Notably, it can exist in two isozyme-forms, Q and R, that exhibit different activities. This study presents an in silico (QSAR, Docking, MD and QM/MM) study of a set of compounds on the activity towards the PON1 isoenzymes (QPON1 and RPON1). Different rates of reaction for the Q and R isoenzymes were analyzed by modelling the effect of Q192R mutation on active sites. It was concluded that the Q192R mutation is not even close to the active site, while it is still changing the geometry of it. Using the combined genetic algorithm with multiple linear regression (GA-MLR) technique, several QSAR models were developed and relative activity rates of the isozymes of PON1 explained. From these, two QSAR models were selected, one each for the QPON1 and RPON1. Best selected models are four-variable MLR models for both Q and R isozymes with squared correlation coefficient R2 values of 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. In addition, the applicability domain of the models was analyzed based on the Williams plot. The results were discussed in the light of the main factors that influence the hydrolysis activity of the PON1 isozymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".