MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304775706 · doi:10.1111/pbr.13057

Genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci for spikelets compactness in two Yanzhan1‐derived recombinant inbred line wheat populations

2022· article· en· W4304775706 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjing Hu, Hongya Wu, Chengbin Lu, Xu Zheng, Jizeng Jia, Weigang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Breeding · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusBiologyInbred strainAllelePopulationGeneticsAgronomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Spikelets compactness (SC) plays an important role in the yield improvement and Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance of wheat. In this study, 151 recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between Yangmai 4 (YM4) and Yanzhan 1 (YZ1) and 143 RIL derived from a cross between Yangmai 5 (YM5) and YZ1 were used to construct two wheat hexaploidy genetic linkage maps, evaluate SC across three years and identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for SC. A total of seven QTL were identified in two populations and explained the phenotypic variation ranging from 6.27% to 22.49%. Four QTL were co‐located in two genomic regions on chromosomes 2D and 6B, namely, QSc‐2D and QSc‐6B , respectively. Comparison analysis showed that QSc‐6B is a novel QTL, whereas QSc‐2D was located in the interval of Rht8 . Significant additive effects of QSc‐2D and QSc‐6B on SC were observed in two RIL populations. Moreover, the positive alleles of these two QTL extremely significantly increased grain number per spike (GNS) but did not have a significantly negative effect on thousand‐grain weight (TGW), kernel length (KL) and kernel weight (KW). Whether in spray or point inoculation, QSc‐6B did not significantly influence FHB resistance in two populations. However, QSc‐2D significantly affected FHB resistance in spray inoculation in YM4/YZ1 population. A breeder‐friendly Kompetitive Allele‐Specific PCR (KASP) marker KASP_6B for QSc‐6B has been developed and verified in a set of 181 wheat cultivars/lines. Furthermore, we preliminary analysed the candidate genes within the physical interval of QSc‐6B by sequence similarity, spatial expression patterns and collinearity analysis. TraesCS6B03G1206900 , TraesCS6B03G1214800 and TraesCS6B03G1218300 show specific expression in spikelet. These results provide valuable information for map‐based cloning of QSc‐6B and a useful tool for wheat breeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant BreedingSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207