An Experimental Investigation of the Displacement Transmissibility for a Two-Stage HSLD Stiffness System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibration isolation across the frequency spectrum is a challenge in many applications, particularly at low frequencies where linear oscillators amplify excitation forces. To overcome this, nonlinear high static low dynamic (HSLD) stiffness oscillators have been proposed with the aim of reducing the resonant frequency while maintaining the high load capacities of much stiffer linear systems. A two-degree of freedom (2DOF) HSLD stiffness system is proposed to investigate the effectiveness of such systems. Experiments reveal that a 2DOF non-linear HSLD stiffness system outperforms a similar single-degree of freedom (SDOF) HSLD stiffness system, as well as similar SDOF and 2DOF linear systems. Three performance criteria are used to assess these systems, including (1) minimizing the resonant frequency and maximizing the isolation zone, (2) minimizing the magnitude of amplification at resonance, and (3) maximizing the ability to isolate large input frequencies. Exact numerical and approximate analytical simulations are validated using these experimental data. A sensitivity analysis of system parameters reveals that it is necessary to incorporate adjustability into the geometry of a design to counteract unavoidable manufacturing tolerances. Changes of less than 2% to the stiffness or geometry of a system can drastically change its dynamic response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it