MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4304889770 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1001686

Noise exposure in early adulthood causes age-dependent and brain region-specific impairments in cognitive function

2022· article· en· W4304889770 on OpenAlexafffund
Salonee V. Patel, Courtney M. DeCarlo, Shae A. Book, Ashley L. Schormans, Shawn N. Whitehead, Brian L. Allman, Sarah H. Hayes

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRoyal National Institute for Deaf PeopleAlzheimer’s Research UK
KeywordsHearing lossAudiologyCognitionNoise (video)PsychologyCognitive declineDementiaWorking memoryEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceMedicineMorris water navigation taskNeuroscienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hearing loss is a chronic health condition that affects millions of people worldwide. In addition to age-related hearing impairment, excessive noise exposure is a leading cause of hearing loss. Beyond the devastating effects of hearing impairment itself, epidemiological studies have identified hearing loss as a major risk factor for age-related cognitive decline, including dementia. At present, we currently lack a full understanding of the brain regions and underlying molecular changes that are responsible for mediating the link between hearing loss and cognitive impairment across aging. In the present study, we exposed 6-month-old rats to an occupational-like noise (100 dB SPL, 4 h/day × 30 days) or sham exposure and investigated both hippocampal-dependent (i.e., spatial learning and memory, assessed using the Morris water maze) and striatal-dependent (i.e., visuomotor associative learning, assessed using an operant-conditioning task) cognitive function across aging at 7, 10, and 13 months of age. We also investigated brain region-specific changes in microglial expression following noise/sham exposure in order to assess the potential contribution of this cell type to noise-induced cognitive impairments. Consistent with human studies, the occupational-like noise exposure resulted in high-frequency hearing loss, evidenced by a significant increase in hearing thresholds at 20 kHz. Ultimately, our results suggest that not all higher-level cognitive tasks or their associated brain regions appear to be equally susceptible to noise-induced deficits during aging, as the occupational-like noise exposure caused an age-dependent deficit in spatial but not visuomotor associative learning, as well as altered microglial expression in the hippocampus but not the striatum. Interestingly, we found no significant relationships between spatial learning ability and the level of hearing loss or altered microglial density in the hippocampus following noise exposure, suggesting that other changes in the brain likely contribute to hippocampal-dependent cognitive dysfunction following noise exposure. Lastly, we found that a subset of younger animals also showed noise-induced deficits in spatial learning; findings which suggest that noise exposure may represent an increased risk for cognitive impairment in vulnerable subjects. Overall, our findings highlight that even a mild occupational-like noise exposure earlier in adulthood can have long lasting implications for cognitive function later in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207