Structurally stable beams in the turbulent atmosphere: dark and antidark beams on incoherent background [Invited]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We demonstrate analytically and verify numerically that recently discovered, and experimentally realized, partially coherent dark and antidark beams are structurally stable on propagation in a statistically homogeneous, isotropic random medium, such as the turbulent atmosphere. The dark/antidark beams defy diffraction in free space, and they manifest themselves as dark/bright notches/bumps against an incoherent background. The structure of a bump/notch remains invariant on propagation of the beam through the random medium, while the peak amplitude of the bump/notch decays with the propagation distance in the medium at a rate dependent on the strength of the medium turbulence. We also evaluate numerically the scintillation index of such beams and show that it is significantly lower than that of generic, low-coherence Gaussian Schell-model beams. The combination of structural stability and low scintillations makes partially coherent dark/antidark beams very promising candidates for information transfer and optical communications through atmospheric turbulence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".