MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artificial Neural Network-Based PMSM Modeling for the Electric Motor Emulation

2022· article· en· W4306148104 on OpenAlex
Hadi Mohajerani, Adam Hassan, Mohammad Sedigh Toulabi, Uday Deshpande, Narayan C. Kar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceLookup tableTorqueSynchronous motorFinite element methodElectric motorElectric machineControl engineeringSimulationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringStatorElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lookup table (LUT)-based modeling of electric machines using finite element analysis (FEA) is an accurate technique for high-fidelity real-time emulation of electric motors, however, the cost of a huge computational burden. To overcome this shortcoming and the need for expensive hardware for the motor emulation, an artificial neural network (ANN)-based modeling method is proposed and developed in this paper for a 22-kW permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM). The ANN-based machine model is trained using back-propagation algorithms and its weights are optimized for the given arbitrary input(s) to consider the non-linearities in a PMSM, which are supposed to be reflected in the LUTs implemented in the emulation system. A strong correlation with minimal error, after comparing the dq-axis currents and electromagnetic torques extracted from both the LUT-based model and proposed ANN-based model under various loading conditions, confirms the accuracy of the proposed computationally efficient ANN-based modeling method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it