MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306174544 · doi:10.1785/0120210315

Region- and Site-Specific Measurements of Kappa (κ0) and Associated Variabilities for Iran

2022· article· en· W4306174544 on OpenAlexaff
Mehran Davatgari-Tafreshi, Sanjay Singh Bora, Hadi Ghofrani, Noorbakhsh Mirzaei, Javad Kazemian

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Standard deviationAccelerationSpectral accelerationMagnitude (astronomy)KappaMathematicsGeodesyStatisticsEnvironmental scienceGeologyPhysicsSeismologyGeometryPeak ground accelerationGround motionAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Spectral parameter kappa (κ) is widely used to model the decay slope of the Fourier acceleration spectrum at high frequencies. This study presents estimates of κ0, often referred to as the site-related contribution in κ, for the Iranian strong-motion dataset. For our analysis, we use 2798 acceleration time histories from 325 earthquakes (between 1976 and 2020, inclusive) in the magnitude range M 3–7.4 and recorded over 285 stations at distances up to 100 km. The main objective of this study is to estimate κ0 and associated uncertainties at Iranian strong-motion stations. We investigate different sources of uncertainty that contribute to the higher scatter in the station-specific measurements of κ0. According to our results, the choice of frequency range used to approximate linear decay of acceleration spectrum contributes significantly to measurement-related uncertainty. Moreover, our measurements exhibit regional variations in (average) κ0 within Iran; in particular, for Zagros, the average κ0(=0.036) is found to be lower than that for northern Iran (κ0=0.044) and central-eastern Iran (κ0=0.04). In terms of between-station variability, there is a weak negative correlation between κ0 and VS30. The within-station uncertainty (i.e., standard deviation of κ0 values at individual stations) is also found to be decreasing with increasing VS30. The fundamental frequency of the site (f0) also appears to affect both measurement-related uncertainty and between-station variability at stations that exhibit significant 1D soil response behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207