VOLTAIRIAN TRADITIONS OF QUEBEC PRESS IN XVIII-XIX CENTURIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
На протяжении XVIII-XIX столетий вольтеровские традиции проявлялись в печати Квебека волнообразно - в зависимости от внешних или внутренних политических событий. Это эпоха Французской революции, время Восстания Патриотов 1837-1838 годов, период деятельности Канадских институтов (1844-1880). Сначала их носителями были издатели первых квебекских газет - американцы и французы, затем вольтеровские традиции продолжили журналисты-уроженцы Квебека. Католическое духовенство и его пресса вели беспощадную борьбу с «еретической» печатью, закончившуюся их победой: вплоть до Тихой революции 1960-х годов в Квебеке преобладала католическая журналистика. During XVIII-XIX centuries Voltairian traditions of Quebec press manifested themselves by waves, in dependence on the world or colonial political events (French Revolution; Patriots’ Rebellion, 1837-1838; Canadian Institutes’ activity, 1844-1880). At the beginning, Voltairian traditions in Quebec press were presented by American and French editors of first Quebec newspapers. Then journalists, natives of Quebec, supported this tendency. However, Catholic clergy and its press gained a victory. So, Catholic journalism dominated in Quebec until Quiet Revolution of 1960s years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".