Endocasts of the basal sauropsid <i>Captorhinus</i> reveal unexpected neurological diversity in early reptiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Captorhinids are a group of Paleozoic amniotes that represents one of the earliest-diverging clades of eureptiles. Although captorhinids are one of the best-known and most well-studied clades of early amniotes, their palaeoneuroanatomy has gone largely unexamined. We utilized neutron computed tomography to study the virtual cranial and otic endocasts of two captorhinid specimens. The neurosensory anatomy of captorhinids shows a mixture of traits considered plesiomorphic for sauropsids (no expansions of the cerebrum or olfactory bulbs, low degree of encephalization, low ossification of the otic capsule) and those considered more derived, including moderate cephalic and pontine flexures and a dorsoventrally tall bony labyrinth. The inner ear clearly preserves the elliptical, sub-orthogonal canals and the short, rounded vestibule, along with an unusually enlarged lateral canal and a unique curvature of the posterior canal. The reconstructed neurosensory anatomy indicates that captorhinids were sensitive to slightly higher frequencies than many of their contemporaries, likely reflecting differences in body size across taxa, while the morphology of the maxillary canal suggests a simple, tubular condition as the plesiomorphic state for Sauropsida and contributes to the ongoing discussions regarding the phylogenetic placement of varanopids. This study represents the first detailed tomographic study of the brain and inner ear of any basal eureptile. The new data described here reveal that the neuroanatomy of early sauropsids is far more complex and diverse than previously anticipated, and provide impetus for further exploration of the palaeoneuroanatomy of early amniotes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".