A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies new genetic loci associated with all-cause and vascular dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Dementia is multifactorial with Alzheimer (AD) and vascular (VaD) pathologies making the largest contributions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 70 genetic risk loci for AD but the genomic determinants of other dementias, including VaD remain understudied. We hypothesize that common forms of dementia will share genetic risk factors and conducted the largest GWAS to date of “all-cause dementia” (ACD) and examined the genetic overlap with VaD. Our dataset includes 809,299 individuals from European, African, Asian, and Hispanic ancestries with 46,902 and 8,702 cases of ACD and VaD, respectively. We replicated known AD loci at genome-wide significance for both ACD and VaD and conducted bioinformatic analyses to prioritize genes that are likely functionally relevant, and shared with closely related traits and risk factors. For ACD, novel loci identified were associated with energy transport ( SEMA4D ), neuronal excitability ( ANO3 ), amyloid deposition in the brain ( RBFOX1 ), and MRI markers of small vessel disease ( HBEGF ). Novel VaD loci were associated with hypertension, diabetes, and neuron maintenance ( SPRY2, FOXA2, AJAP1 , and PSMA3 ). Our study identified genetic risks underlying all-cause dementia, demonstrating overlap with neurodegenerative processes, vascular risk factors (Type-II diabetes, blood pressure, lipid) and cerebral small vessel disease. These novel insights could lead to new prevention and treatment strategies for all dementias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".