MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise induced coronary inflammation in masters athletes

2022· article· en· W4306251242 on OpenAlexaff
Efstathios Papatheodorou, Christine K. Kissel, A Merghani, Rebecca Hughes, Camilla Torlasco, Athanasios Bakalakos, Emily Downs, Gemma Parry‐Williams, Gherardo Finocchiaro, A Malhotra, James Moon, Michael Papadakis, K Al Fakih, Damini Dey, Sanjay Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAthletesCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineCardiologyInflammationCoronary atherosclerosisArteryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic endurance exercise has been linked to increased prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in male master athletes. Data are limited regarding the presence of exercise-induced coronary inflammation and its association with atherosclerosis in master endurance athletes. Human coronary inflammation can be detected non-invasively by imaging pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT). We tested the hypothesis that chronic endurance exercise leads to increased prevalence of atherosclerosis via coronary inflammation. Methods Computed tomography coronary angiogram CTCA scans from 2 cohorts of master athletes and age-matched controls, without known risk factors for CAD, were analysed post-hoc and the PCAT attenuation index was calculated around the proximal right coronary artery (FAIRCA). The athletes and the healthy controls also underwent an electrocardiogram, an echocardiogram, a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), a 24-hour Holter tape and a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) scan. Results Scans from 243 masters endurance athletes (62% females) and 58 age and Framingham CAD risk score matched healthy controls were analysed. FAIRCA was significantly higher (less negative) in male masters athletes vs female masters athletes [−61.3 Hounsfield Units (HU) vs −62.8 HU, p=0.01], in male athletes vs male controls (−61.3 HU vs −68.6 HU, p<0.001) and in female athletes vs female controls (−62,8 HU vs −67.5 HU, p=0.005). In female masters athletes, peak oxygen consumption during CPET (peak VO2) statistically significantly predicted the FAIRCA, F(1,146) = 22.62, p<0.0001. There was no correlation between the FAIRCA and presence of atherosclerosis in male masters athletes. Conclusions Masters athletes show increased markers of coronary inflammation. This effect appears to be greater in male masters athletes and is associated with a higher peak VO2 in female masters athletes. However, we did not identify a link between coronary inflammation and coronary atherosclerosis in this cohort. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Cardiac Risk in the Young, UK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207