MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of fatigue loading in Francis turbine runners using extreme values interpolation

2022· article· en· W4306251675 on OpenAlexaff
Quang Hung Pham, M Gagnon, Maryse Page

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)KrigingExtreme value theoryTurbineMarine engineeringPower (physics)Francis turbineEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsEngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMotion (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extreme values of strain signals are important for hydroelectric turbine runners fatigue assessment. However, due to measurements limitations such as short data length and limited subset of measured operation conditions, the extreme values are rarely fully captured. Our study aims to estimate the extreme values of runner strain at non-measured operating conditions by interpolating the extreme components from the measured ones. The method is based on the peaks over threshold technique and the kriging interpolation. A case study with two similar Francis turbines (same design and power plant) is presented. The comparison is made between the use of independent interpolation models and a combined model for the two turbines. This helps assess the assumption that similar turbines share similar fatigue loading. If that is the case, a common model for the whole fleet of similar turbines design in a given facility could be considered, and thus contribute to reduce the uncertainties related to unmeasured loadings without the need for in-situ measurements on every runner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207