PCI of chronic total occlusions: what is the clinical benefit and impact on quality of life?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) are relatively common findings in the context of coronary angiography. The indication for revascularization of this type of lesions remains controversial. The recommendations of international cardiology societies consider the treatment of CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients, but this technique is not yet widely used in this context. Objectives To evaluate the clinical and quality of life impact of patients undergoing PCI-CTO, including angina, heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), mortality and improved quality of life (QoL) after the procedure. Methods Retrospective study for biennium 2019/2020, composed of n=177 patients undergoing PCI-CTO. A descriptive and comparative analysis of the sample regarding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients was performed, to whom a quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Brief) was applied. The descriptive analysis was based on means and standard deviations and on the analysis of statistical tests, t-Student and Mann-Whitney were performed according to the parametric and non-parametric context, respectively. Results A total of 177 patients were identified, with a mean age of 65.7±11.2 years, 51.5% female. 75% of patients showed high blood pressure, 39% diabetes and 80.5% NSTEMI. At 30 days after PCI only 21% of patients had symptoms (angina or HF), with clinical improvement at 180 days to 10% symptomatic. Regarding QoL, an average score of 4.3 (maximum of 5) was obtained for the 2 questions that independently assess the patient's perception of their QoL after the procedure. High levels of scores were also obtained by domains (QoL>70%), with marked improvement in the Physical, Environmental and Psychological domains, becoming more evident in the latter at 30 days after the procedure in patients who remained asymptomatic (75.2%, p=0.023). This benefit was accompanied by improvement in left ventricular function (LVEF), being more evident in asymptomatic patients and without events after procedure. Mortality and AMI occurred in 6% and 2%, respectively. Conclusion The majority of patients had clinical benefit and expressed improvement in QoL after undergoing PCI-CTO, which was accompanied by improvement in LVEF, reinforcing the usefulness of the technique and the approach of this type of lesions in selected patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".