MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4306290825 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.512

The Mueller maneuver attenuates left atrial phasic volumes and myocardial strain in healthy younger adults

2022· article· en· W4306290825 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen P. Wright, Tony G. Dawkins, Megan I. Harper, Rob Shave, Neil D. Eves

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineDiastoleStroke volumeMitral valveHemodynamicsSpeckle tracking echocardiographyIsovolumic relaxation timeDoppler echocardiographyHeart rateBlood pressureEjection fractionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Negative intrathoracic pressure swings alter cardiac loading conditions, which may impact left atrial hemodynamic function and augment atrial stress. If such changes occur and are repeated chronically, they may contribute to the marked atrial remodeling seen in states associated with forceful inspiratory efforts such as endurance training or obstructive sleep apnea. Purpose We studied the acute effects of static inspiratory efforts on left atrial chamber function, myocardial mechanics, and diastolic function. Methods We included healthy adults (10M/7F, 24±4 years) and used Mueller maneuvers to reduce intrathoracic pressure to a −30 cmH2O target for 15 seconds. Over 6 repeated trials, we used echocardiography to acquire left atrial and ventricular focused 2D images, and mitral Doppler inflow and annular tissue velocity spectra. Images were analyzed offline to determine left ventricular volumes, tissue relaxation velocities, trans-mitral filling velocities, and phasic left atrial volumes and myocardial strain using speckle-tracking imaging. Repeated measures were made at Baseline, within the last 5 seconds of the Mueller maneuver, and within the first 5 seconds after release, with 3–5 cardiac cycles averaged per measurement. Results Compared to Baseline, hemodynamic changes occurred during the late phase of the Mueller maneuver and immediately after release. Left ventricular stroke volume decreased by −10±4 mL (p<0.05) then returned to baseline upon release; this was associated with a −11±9 mL (p<0.05) reduction in end-diastolic volume. Left ventricular early diastolic filling attenuated, reflected by decreases in mitral annular relaxation velocity (−2±2 cm/s, p<0.05), E-wave filling velocity (−13±14 cm/s, p<0.05), and left atrial passive emptying volume (−5±5 mL, p<0.05), each normalizing upon release. Left atrial maximal volume decreased (−5±5 mL, p<0.05) during the Mueller maneuver, but increased relative to baseline (+4±5 mL, p=0.049) following release, while left atrial peak positive longitudinal strain decreased (−6±6%, p<0.05) and normalized upon release. Conclusions Attenuated left atrial and in turn ventricular filling may contribute to acute stroke volume reduction during forceful inspiratory efforts. Rapid changes in left atrial chamber volumes and myocardial strain with the release of forceful inspiratory efforts may reflect acute left atrial stress. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→