Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease that affects as many as 30% of patients with psoriasis, an immune-mediated inflammatory skin condition. Several domains are recognized in PsA, including peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, and skin and nail manifestations.1 Although PsA affects men and women equally, there may be a sex influence on the development and expression of the disease.2 In the past few decades, there has been increasing interest in the effect of sex on the manifestations and impact of PsA as well as on the response to therapy. There may be some genetic reasons. For example, a paternal transmission was noted in PsA.3 The role of female hormones has not been confirmed because although some studies suggested that women with PsA had low pregnancy rates, this was not observed in a recent study.4,5 A difference in axial disease expression between men and women was noted in a 1992 study that compared 82 women with 112 men with axial disease and showed that there was more advanced disease in men.6 Similar observations were reported by Queiro et al, who found that axial disease together with HLA-B27 occurred more commonly among men, whereas women had more … Address correspondence to Dr. D.D. Gladman, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, 1E410B, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada. Email: dafna.gladman{at}utoronto.ca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".