Focal epilepsy impacts rapid eye movement sleep microstructure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Whereas there is plenty of evidence on the influence of epileptic activity on non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep macro- and micro-structure, data on the impact of epilepsy on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep remains sparse. Using high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG), we assessed global and focal disturbances of sawtooth waves (STW) as cortically generated sleep oscillations of REM sleep in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (13 females; mean age, 32.6 ± 10.7 years; 12 temporal lobe epilepsy) and 12 healthy controls (3 females; 24.0 ± 3.2 years) underwent combined overnight HD-EEG and polysomnography. STW rate, duration, frequency, power, spatial extent, IED rates and sleep homeostatic properties were analyzed. RESULTS: STW rate and duration were reduced in patients with focal epilepsy compared to healthy controls (rate: 0.64/min ± 0.46 vs. 1.12/min ± 0.41, p = .005, d = -0.98; duration: 3.60 s ± 0.76 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .003, d = -1.01). Not surprisingly given the fronto-central maximum of STW, the reductions were driven by extratemporal lobe epilepsy patients (rate: 0.45/min ± 0.31 vs. 1.12/min ± 0.41, p = .0004, d = -1.35; duration: 3.49 s ± 0.92 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .017, d = -0.99) and were more pronounced in the first vs. the last sleep cycle (rate first cycle patients vs. controls: 0.60/min ± 0.49 vs. 1.10/min ± 0.55, p = .016, d = -0.90, rate last cycle patients vs. controls: 0.67/min ± 0.51 vs. 0.99/min ± 0.49, p = .11, d = -0.62; duration first cycle patients vs. controls: 3.60s ± 0.76 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .003, d = -1.01, duration last cycle patients vs. controls: 3.66s ± 0.84 vs. 4.51 ± 1.26, p = .039, d = -0.80). There was no regional decrease of STWs in the region with the epileptic focus vs. the contralateral side (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with focal epilepsy and in particular extratemporal lobe epilepsy show a global reduction of STW activity in REM sleep. This may suggest that epilepsy impacts cortically generated sleep oscillations even in REM sleep when epileptic activity is low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".