MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306293638 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac250

Focal epilepsy impacts rapid eye movement sleep microstructure

2022· article· en· W4306293638 on OpenAlexafffund
Katharina Schiller, Nicolás von Ellenrieder, Tamir Avigdor, Charbel El Kosseifi, Chifaou Abdallah, Erica Minato, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersHewitt FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEpilepsySleep (system call)Eye movementRapid eye movement sleepMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyNeuroscienceOphthalmologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Whereas there is plenty of evidence on the influence of epileptic activity on non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep macro- and micro-structure, data on the impact of epilepsy on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep remains sparse. Using high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG), we assessed global and focal disturbances of sawtooth waves (STW) as cortically generated sleep oscillations of REM sleep in patients with focal epilepsy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (13 females; mean age, 32.6 ± 10.7 years; 12 temporal lobe epilepsy) and 12 healthy controls (3 females; 24.0 ± 3.2 years) underwent combined overnight HD-EEG and polysomnography. STW rate, duration, frequency, power, spatial extent, IED rates and sleep homeostatic properties were analyzed. RESULTS: STW rate and duration were reduced in patients with focal epilepsy compared to healthy controls (rate: 0.64/min ± 0.46 vs. 1.12/min ± 0.41, p = .005, d = -0.98; duration: 3.60 s ± 0.76 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .003, d = -1.01). Not surprisingly given the fronto-central maximum of STW, the reductions were driven by extratemporal lobe epilepsy patients (rate: 0.45/min ± 0.31 vs. 1.12/min ± 0.41, p = .0004, d = -1.35; duration: 3.49 s ± 0.92 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .017, d = -0.99) and were more pronounced in the first vs. the last sleep cycle (rate first cycle patients vs. controls: 0.60/min ± 0.49 vs. 1.10/min ± 0.55, p = .016, d = -0.90, rate last cycle patients vs. controls: 0.67/min ± 0.51 vs. 0.99/min ± 0.49, p = .11, d = -0.62; duration first cycle patients vs. controls: 3.60s ± 0.76 vs. 4.57 ± 1.00, p = .003, d = -1.01, duration last cycle patients vs. controls: 3.66s ± 0.84 vs. 4.51 ± 1.26, p = .039, d = -0.80). There was no regional decrease of STWs in the region with the epileptic focus vs. the contralateral side (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with focal epilepsy and in particular extratemporal lobe epilepsy show a global reduction of STW activity in REM sleep. This may suggest that epilepsy impacts cortically generated sleep oscillations even in REM sleep when epileptic activity is low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207