MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306316506 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6810729

Mobilisation des connaissances pour les soins primaires

2022· article· fr· W4306316506 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Leslie Rourke, James Rourke, Denis Leduc, Patricia Li, Anne Rowan-Legg, Imaan Bayoumi, Bruce Kwok

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

> Dans les hôpitaux, les maladies restent et les gens vont et viennent; en pratique générale, les gens restent et les maladies vont et viennent . > > Iona Heath[1][1] Le Relevé postnatal Rourke (RPR) : pourquoi et comment cet outil de pratique a-t-il survécu, et comment a-t-il préservé sa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207