MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling cardiac fibroblast heterogeneity in fibrotic heart using human pluripotent stem cell derived epicardial cells

2022· article· en· W4306319761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Satoshi Funakoshi, I F Fernandes, G K Keller

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellOrganoidMyocyteStem cellMedicineCell biologyHeart developmentHeart failureCardiac myocyteInternal medicineCardiologyBiologyEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Our understanding of human cardiac pathophysiology is limited due to the scarcity of human heart samples. Model organisms do not faithfully recapitulate human physiology and pathophysiology to the extent that is needed. Therefore, human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived cardiac cells represent promising sources to overcome these limitations to studying heart diseases. Purpose To generate cardiac organoids mimicking the interaction between cardiomyocytes and non-cardiomyocytes in the developing heart and the postnatal pathological conditions. Method It has been well known that epicardium is a main source of non-cardiac cells in the developing heart. We therefore generated cardiac organoids by mixing hPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and hPSC-derived epicardium and test if they could mimic the developing heart and be applicable for modeling heart failure. Results We established a cardiac organoid system generated from human pluripotent stem cells that models the developing heart's early interactions, specifically the epicardial and non-myocyte development, as well as ventricular cardiomyocyte proliferation. Inside the cardiac organoids, epicardium spontaneously differentiated into CD90-positive cardiac fibroblasts expressing fibroblast markers, FN, COL1 and COL3, and CD90-negative smooth muscle cells (SMC) expressing SMC markers, ACTA2 and MYH11. Additionally, we observed the significant increase in cardiomyocyte proliferation in the cardiac organoids compared to in cardiomyocyte only aggregation (p<0.001). We then mature our cardiac organoids using our unique maturation method, the combination of PPARα agonist, dexamethasone, T3 hormone, and palmitate, generating metabolically mature cardiac organoids. These mature organoids recapitulated the phenotypic changes observed in the failing human heart when exposed to pathological stimuli, including fibrosis, metabolic changes, and increase in heart failure markers. We used single-cell transcriptomics to dissect the cellular heterogeneity of our organoids in a model of heart failure with comparisons to primary human data and revealed our organoids recapitulated in vivo human failing heart. This analysis allowed to confirm that our organoids contain a unique subpopulation of cardiac fibroblasts possessing reparative features, suggesting the recapitulation of in vivo heterogeneity in our model. Conclusions We successfully generated cardiac organoids mimicking the interaction between cardiomyocytes and non-cardiac cells. Our system enables the recapitulation of in vivo heterogeneity, providing a platform for the accurate understanding of heart development and disease in a dish. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207