MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Arterial hypertension, cognitive decline and cerebrovascular damage

2022· article· en· W4306320686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tünde Pál, Zoltán Preg, Robert Gabriel Tripon, Beáta Baróti, H Haba, Enikő Nemes-Nagy, Márta Germán-Salló

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCardiologyDementiaInternal medicineBlood pressureMagnetic resonance imagingCognitionCognitive declineStroke (engine)DiseaseRadiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Arterial hypertension has been associated with increased risk of cognitive dysfunction (CD) and dementia explained by the onset of cerebral microvascular disease. However, it is not well known which are true markers of cognitive decline and how to demonstrate them. Purpose We aimed to evaluate cognitive functions and study microvascular disease with cerebral localization in hypertensive patients. Methods Patients over 50 years with arterial hypertension were included. Cognitive status was assessed by using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tests. We selected 50 patients in two groups: 25 patients with mild CD (MoCA <26 points, MMSE >24 points), respectively 25 patients without CD (MoCA ≥26 points, MMSE ≥24 points). In these groups, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using GE Optima MR450w 1.5 Tesla of the brain was performed. MRI images with the RadiAnt program were studied and ImageJ was used to measure the area of the thalamus with a method developed by our team, by calculating the total area and hyperintense areas (microvascular damage) in number of pixels. For statistical analysis IBM-SPSS v.26 program was used. Results 585 consecutive hypertensive patients were enrolled, mean age 67.9±9.5 years, 52.1% women, mean blood pressure 135/80±20/11 mmHg (with antihypertensive treatment). The MoCA test identified cognitive impairment in 66.1% of participants (mean scores 20.66±3.9) while the MMSE in 17.1% (mean scores 20.64±3.0). In the subgroup of 50 patients, the mean age was 70.9±5.5 years for the CD group and 69.9±3.9 years for the group without CD (p=0.4, between 59–79 years). No significant difference was detected between groups in mean blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure, and hypertension duration (18.0±12 years vs. 17.7, p=0.9). Cerebrovascular disease was detected in 48 patients by brain MRI. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The most frequent changes were white matter hyperintensities in 89.6%, enlarged perivascular spaces in 77.1%, and lacunar infarcts in 52.1%. In three cases silent brain infarct was unmasked. In 45 patients, we applied the modified measurement of the thalamic area and a statistically significant difference was detected in the right thalamus area in patients with CD (p=0.009) compared to patients without CD (on the left side p=0.058). Conclusions CD and cerebral microvascular changes were frequently present in hypertensive patients with associated cardiovascular disease in the studied group. At the level of the thalamus with the method developed by our team, we demonstrated that microvascular alterations on the right side are associated with cognitive decline. The methodology developed for the quantitative measurement of the injured thalamic area proved to be objective and repeatable. The innovative method, the analysis of imaging data with pixels is a promising way to continue the research. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Hungarian Academy of Science

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→