MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-term outcomes following transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation with the sapien 3 valve: an international multicentre registry

2022· article· en· W4306321030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Hascoët, James R. Bentham, P Betrian-Belasco, Ali Houeijeh, Matthew Jones, Elżbieta Katarzyna Biernacka, Clément Karsenty, Sophie Malekzadeh‐Milani, Gaute Døhlen, Marinos Kantzis, Estíbaliz Valdeolmillos, Stanimir Georgiev, Patrice Guérin, A Tengler, Alain Fraisse

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricular outflow tractSurgeryCohortRetrospective cohort studyAdverse effectPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is indicated to treat right-ventricular outflow tract dysfunction related to congenital heart disease. Long-term outcomes following TPVI with the new-generation SAPIEN 3 valve are not well documented. Purpose We investigated mid-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent TPVI using the SAPIEN 3 valve. Methods We retrospectively analysed data from a multicentre observational registry of patients who underwent TPVI with SAPIEN 3 in 30 centres in 12 countries from Europe, the Middle East, and Canada. Patient-related, procedural, and mid-term-outcome data were assessed. Results We obtained data for 713 patients treated in 2014–2021. Number of procedures performed among centres varied from 1 to 190 with a median of 15. Median age was 29.4-year-old [19.0–42.8]. The most common underlying diagnosis was cono-truncal defect (68.9%), with a native or patched right-ventricular outflow tract, a bioprosthetic valve, a homograft and a conduit, in 50.8%, 19.6%, 16.5% and 13.2% patients, respectively. Pre-stenting was performed in 74.8% patients. The 20-mm, 23-mm, 26-mm, and 29-mm valves were used in 0.4%, 28.2%, 31.2%, and 40.2% of patients, respectively. Valve implantation was successful in 98.6% patients. Life-threatening peri-procedural adverse events occurred in 3.7% patients, including 0.6% peri-procedural death. Median follow-up was 1.4 years (maximum, 5.9 years; 1160 patient-years), At last follow-up, pulmonary regurgitation grade 2, 3 and 4 was noted in 6.9%, 0.9% and 0.0% patients, respectively. Median maximal gradient at last follow-up was 18 mmHg. Six patients experienced infective endocarditis (0.5 per 100 patient-years) of whom 1 died and 2 required pulmonary valve replacement. Nine patients (0.8 per 100 patient-years) had secondary pulmonary valve replacement (including 2 by valve-in-valve TPVI; 7 patients had 23-mm and 2 had 26-mm valves). Four patients experienced pulmonary valve thrombosis (0.6 per 100 patient-year) of whom one died and 3 resolved under anticoagulation therapy. Cumulative incidences of infective endocarditis, secondary pulmonary valve replacement and valve thrombosis were 0.7%, 1.3% and 1.3%; 0.4%, 1.3% and 4.6%; 0.5%, 0.5% and 0.8% at 1, 3 and 5 years after TPVI respectively. Conclusion TPVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve was feasible and safe in a wide range of patients with congenital heart defects, most of whom had large native right-ventricular outflow tracts. Mid-term outcomes were favourable. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): The study is promoted and financially supported by a Research grant of the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→