MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306362593 · doi:10.5515/kjkiees.2022.33.9.720

Clutter Suppression Technique Using Denoising Encoder-Decoder Deep Learning Network

2022· article· en· W4306362593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsClutterComputer scienceConstant false alarm rateArtificial intelligenceRadarContinuous-wave radarElectronic engineeringReal-time computingEngineeringRadar imagingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clutter is the radar noise signal that is reflected from the elements surrounding the targets. Since clutter degrades the radar system’s range and doppler frequency detection capability, clutter suppression is a critical signal-processing algorithm that can improve the performance of a radar system. This paper proposes a ground-clutter suppression method using denoising encoder-decoder deep learning network with dual encoding channels, residual connections, and skip connections. Radar signal dataset pipeline was generated using MATLAB in order to train the network. In this paper, deep learning-based clutter suppression method that can be applied in various operating conditions, is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it