MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306362593 · doi:10.5515/kjkiees.2022.33.9.720

Clutter Suppression Technique Using Denoising Encoder-Decoder Deep Learning Network

2022· article· en· W4306362593 on OpenAlexaff
Byungchan Choi, Doyu Lim, Sehoon Kwon, Jihyun Kim, Ji-Han Joo, Haewoon Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsClutterComputer scienceConstant false alarm rateArtificial intelligenceRadarContinuous-wave radarElectronic engineeringReal-time computingEngineeringRadar imagingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clutter is the radar noise signal that is reflected from the elements surrounding the targets. Since clutter degrades the radar system’s range and doppler frequency detection capability, clutter suppression is a critical signal-processing algorithm that can improve the performance of a radar system. This paper proposes a ground-clutter suppression method using denoising encoder-decoder deep learning network with dual encoding channels, residual connections, and skip connections. Radar signal dataset pipeline was generated using MATLAB in order to train the network. In this paper, deep learning-based clutter suppression method that can be applied in various operating conditions, is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and ScienceSame topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207